It's very odd.. whenever NumLock is on, Fn+down arrow (which is supposed to have effect of lowering brightness) doesn't do anything. Without NumLock, it works fine. I've booted into gnome Fedora 13 LiveCD and it works just fine with or without NumLock
18/000845 <+kalikiana> angelos: I had a keyboard issue with numlock in Midori, maybe it's the same problem 18/000904 <+kalikiana> the solution was to apply a state mask 18/001012 <+kalikiana> angelos: it was those 3 lines: 18/001012 <+kalikiana> #define MIDORI_KEYS_MODIFIER_MASK (GDK_SHIFT_MASK | GDK_CONTROL_MASK \ 18/001012 <+kalikiana> | GDK_MOD1_MASK | GDK_META_MASK | GDK_SUPER_MASK | GDK_HYPER_MASK ) 18/001012 <+kalikiana> event->state = event->state & MIDORI_KEYS_MODIFIER_MASK; This is most likely the issue. I wasn't able to try with that though since xfpm doesn't use GdkEventButtons and I have no idea how XfpmButtons work.
Created attachment 3762 grab the key with any modifier set with this patch the key is grabbed regardless of any modifiers set. this means that it will also work together with shift, ctrl, caps lock, alt, any combination of those. since I doubt any of those keys has a second meaning (ctrl+power for example), this shouldn't break anything. in case it does, here are the possible modifiers: >The valid keymask bits are: ShiftMask, LockMask, ControlMask, Mod1Mask, Mod2Mask, Mod3Mask, Mod4Mask, and Mod5Mask. don't know which one of those is num lock, but if you need it, I can try to find it out.
version 0.8.x no longer supported.
My patch is against 1.0.10, please reopen...
This bug had been in power manager for over a year and has a patch applied for 3 months now... please reopen the bug and apply it, this bug is extremely annoying
Reopening as per Comment #4 and adjusting Version: field accordingly.
*** Bug 7997 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 8360 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It seems that without this patch, at least on my x201s, brightness keys won't be detected at all, even without any modifier pressed.
This one is still present in 1.0.11, could the patch be queued for 1.0.12?
(In reply to comment #10) > This one is still present in 1.0.11, could the patch be queued for 1.0.12? I second this request, http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager/files/xfce4-power-manager-1.0.10-modifiers.patch?view=log still applied cleanly on 1.0.11 release :-/ (Sorry for saying "Me too.")
Applied in 4996f3d.